SRI LANAKAN’S COMPLAIN ABOUT HIGH COST OF LIVING
Today many Sri Lankans complain about the high “cost of living”. In this regard, everyone seems to think, “cost of living” is all about the “cost of services and commodities” that people incur in “living”. Well, in a way that is true. However, I would like to stretch that definition and understanding a little further, and argue that “cost of living” is more about the ability and financial strength that people process at a given time to meet those living costs. After all even if prices of commodities and services were rising, if our wages and incomes were also correspondingly rising to levels, which are, enough to meet those rising costs not be too adversely felt.
In most developed countries, the people’s average wages are sufficient to provide for food and drink in a fraction of around 20%, for housing about 25% for clothing 10% for education 10% for leisure and travel 10% for savings 15% and for other special interests. However, in Sri Lanka, the average lower middle class Sri Lankans spends almost 80 – 90% of their earnings on food, drink, and shelter, which leaves very little for them to spend on other essentials and to save for a rainy day.
In my view this issues cannot be dealt with by tinkering about with the selling prices of a few essential commodities or services only. The response should be a multi – pronged and integrated one. At the same time, it should be noted that the only long – term solution is the increasing of opportunities to people to enhance their income levels, and to boost their productivity levels. So it is clear that our economic activity should be clearly focused on these objectives at all times.
On the issue of attempting to deal with the rising cost of living we must now try to think of fresh initiatives instead of only traversing the same old beaten track of attempting to reduce commodity prices. To a certain extreme granting of selected subsidies and income support schemes for the poorest of the poor. In our country, we have a large percentage of very "poor people" and I believe that strategies that provide the poorest sections are strengthened to face the economic challenges of a liberalized economy. But we should not forget that producers too are consumers within a national economy. Therefore, we must remember that when producers are well off and economically stronger, the economic cycle gets healthier and consequently everyone will benefit in the long and medium term.